For the love of Tweetie

Tweetie is my preferred twitter client for iPhone. I have about 4 others installed (including Twitterific and Twitterfon) but use nothing but Tweetie. I therefore had good reason to be excited about the release of the Tweetie Mac client a couple of days ago.

I expected it to be good, I didn’t expect to love it. And I do love it.

At first, I thought this was because:

  • It has proper customizable show and hide commands
  • You can easily do searches without switching client or using twitter’s webpage
  • You can ‘tear off’ searches and keep them running
  • It displays conversations as conversations
  • You can retweet, and you can post webpages using a Tweetie bookmarklet
  • Easy access to @ replies and direct messages

Then I realized something – those are the things that make it good, not the reason I love it. I actually love it because it is simple yet does advanced things, its smooth, it’s well laid out, it flows, it looks pretty. It has streamlined things I didn’t even realize I did regularly until I can now do them with less hassle. In short: it is well designed. You can never underestimate the power of something that is well designed - its what moves software from being useful to being a real pleasure to use.

The Twitterific client has been removed from my Mac dock. Not only has Tweetie taken its place, but I’ve actually designated some screen real estate for it to live in. It deserves it. A reminder to us all that thoughtful design is worth more than the sum of any number of features.

       

State of Play for Newspaper Publishing

I was lucky enough to see an advanced screening of ‘State of Play’ this weekend – a new movie with Ben Affleck and Russell Crowe. It was a good movie; not big action or anything but a good conspiracy plot and worth a watch. However, what I thought you might be interested to hear about was the sub-plot about blogging versus newspaper publishing in an internet era.

A theme ran through the whole movie questioning whether publishing a story immediately is the right thing to do. Just because you can publish straight away, should you? Are you doing it justice? Do you have all the facts? Can opinions really be formed that quickly or do they need to settle, be reviewed, slept on and formalised? This made me think about the recent #amazonfail tagging frenzy on twitter, where an outpouring of rage erupted within hours of the apparent removal of books with gay and lesbian references from the search ranks. Amazon have since cited an error as the cause, and much has been blogged about the initial online reaction and the way in which Amazon handled it. It confirms that we don’t yet have answers to the questions raised in the film – did people react too quickly just because they had a forum to do it on? Should they have waited for facts to emerge?

The online world needs to be careful that it does not become stereotyped as a hot bed of overreaction and scare-mongering. There is no benefit in a reputation for being the fastest off the blocks with news if the news always turns out to be over-hyped. That said, we cannot ignore the huge potential that instantaneous opinion gives us. Instead of a battle between print and digital news media, it would be good to see a complementary alliance between the two. Online, opinion can grow and change without fear of reprimand if it is understood that this is the purpose of this media. The printed word by nature is a slower beast, and as such is the perfect medium for measured reflective opinion. Both have value.

Ironically, because I saw the film early I am choosing to post this prior to the general release of the film in the UK. I did wonder if I should wait a while. Anyway, go see the movie – it is food for thought with a few geek jokes scattered around.