Hannah Whaley . com

A recent study informs us that 75% of 16-24 year olds feel that they “couldn’t live without the internet”. I hope we can presume that the removal of technology does not pose any actual physiological threat to their well being, and they are referring to the “OMG, like, soooo totally dead” kind of not living. Sadly 16-24 has not been my checkbox of honesty for a while now, but it still made me ponder about a week that I recently spent with very limited access to technology and internet. We found ourselves in a technology black spot in the Lake District with no phone signal, no 3G or Edge, slower than modem internet (3G USB dongle was insistent on using all processor power available to maintain a steady speed of 1kbps) and a TV that was used almost solely for the baby channels (sis-in-law and baby were with us). I did survive, but a series of very minor events led me form a similar conclusion to that expressed in the study:

1. My husband always buys a new PC game for going on holiday, to play when others are reading or generally having downtime. While PC games don’t require an internet connection just to play, it seems they now require a connection to install themselves and do their anti-piracy stuff before they will let you play. Dongle not working, we paid our £1 for 1 hour of wifi at the reception area (several times) and downloaded approximately nothing. After a day of failed attempts, we eventually resorted to finding a McDonalds and buying a Big Mac meal in order to use their wifi. All for something that previously we hadn’t even known required the internet.

2. A chap on local radio said that the new Cheryl Cole video was “not what he’d expected from her at all” which made me curious enough to whip out my iPhone and have a look. Unable to get YouTube, I became irked at every mention of it on the radio thereafter. My hubbie reminded me that I could always watch it when we got home the following week, instantly creating a fine line between passing interest and semi-obsessive Cheryl superfan.

3. Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace prize. Despite the fact that I have followed every minutiae of media effort surrounding him for the last 2 years, I was four days late in finding out this news. Even now, there is a significant part of me that doesn’t really think it happened, because I didn’t *see* it happen online. I didn’t get the realtime reaction and interest on twitter and by the time I was reading about it online, it was very much in the post-analysis phase.

So have any of these things had any significant impact in my life? Of course not, but either I’ve become a product of the spoilt brat culture of modern civilisation and can’t wait for anything, or the promise of ubiquitous computing has arrived and changed the way I expect to interact with the world and events around me. I am going to choose to believe the latter.

In real terms, Husband played his game, I watched YouTube when I got home and world events have now been proven to happen even without my watchful gaze. However, in the not too distant past, McDonalds was merely a place to eat, favourite videos would wait to be viewed on Thursdays on Top of the Pops, and at some point in the week it may have occurred to me to buy a newspaper. It highlights how automated our expectation of access has become and that it now requires a conscious adjustment to live without it. I guess that’s what the teens were trying to tell us in their survey.